Ahmed, R., El gemaey, W., Ramadan, A. (2022). Effect of Arch-Wire Coating on Friction of Ceramic Bracket laboratory study. Dental Science Updates, 3(1), 25-31. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2022.86825.1073
Reem Ahmed; Walaa El gemaey; Ahmed abdel Fattah Ramadan. "Effect of Arch-Wire Coating on Friction of Ceramic Bracket laboratory study". Dental Science Updates, 3, 1, 2022, 25-31. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2022.86825.1073
Ahmed, R., El gemaey, W., Ramadan, A. (2022). 'Effect of Arch-Wire Coating on Friction of Ceramic Bracket laboratory study', Dental Science Updates, 3(1), pp. 25-31. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2022.86825.1073
Ahmed, R., El gemaey, W., Ramadan, A. Effect of Arch-Wire Coating on Friction of Ceramic Bracket laboratory study. Dental Science Updates, 2022; 3(1): 25-31. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2022.86825.1073
Effect of Arch-Wire Coating on Friction of Ceramic Bracket laboratory study
1Orthodontic, faculty of dentistry and oral surgery, Suez canal university, Ismailia ,Egypt
2Orthodontic, faculty of dentistry and oral surgery, Suez canal university, Ismailia, Egypt
Abstract
Introduction: The increasing demand for esthetics has promoted the development of wires coated with polymeric materials such as polymer matrix reinforced with glassfibers. Thus, the surface and thickness of metallic-coated wires can be modified to affect corrosive properties, mechanical durability and especially friction forces. Aim: To evaluate the frictional properties between Teflon coated and non-coated stainless-steel orthodontic arch-wires (0.017 x 0.025-inches and 0.019 x 0.025-inches) with ceramic brackets of 0.018 and 0.022-inch slots. Material and methods: Sixteen orthodontic maxillary premolar mono-crystalline ceramic brackets, eight brackets with 0.018-inch and eight brackets with 0.022-inch slot size. Roth prescription were used. Twenty stainless-steel 0.017 x 0.025-inch arch-wires were used (ten Teflon coated and ten noncoated). Twenty stainless-steel 0.019 x 0.025-inch arch-wires were used (ten Teflon coated and ten non-coated). All arch-wires were cut to symmetrical equal halves using a wire cutter at the midline and each half was used separately. The total number of wire segments used in the study was eighty orthodontic maxillary stainless-steel archwires. Each ceramic bracket tested five wire segments using new elastomeric modules each time. Each bracket was translated the same distance (5mm) relative to its wire segment by the LR5K Lloyd universal testing machine at the same speed of (5mm per minute). Results: The non-coated 17x25 –inch thickness stainless steel arch-wires showed higher friction than coated ones and the non-coated 0.019 x 0.025-inch. The coated 0.019x 0.025-inches stainless steel wire segments showed significant highest friction of 1687.25±97.5 than non-coated 0.019x 0.025-inches and coated/non-coated 0.017x 0.025-inches wire segments. Conclusion: The coated stainless-steel arch-wires had higher friction than the non-coated stainless-steel arch-wires on mono-crystalline ceramic brackets.
View on SCiNiTO
Top