Mohammed, A., Eid, M., Hamed, T. (2024). Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar, Evaluation of a New Scale of Difficulty. Dental Science Updates, 5(1), 49-58. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2024.188601.1158
Aya Aly Mohammed; Mohammed Hassan Eid; Tamer Hamed. "Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar, Evaluation of a New Scale of Difficulty". Dental Science Updates, 5, 1, 2024, 49-58. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2024.188601.1158
Mohammed, A., Eid, M., Hamed, T. (2024). 'Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar, Evaluation of a New Scale of Difficulty', Dental Science Updates, 5(1), pp. 49-58. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2024.188601.1158
Mohammed, A., Eid, M., Hamed, T. Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar, Evaluation of a New Scale of Difficulty. Dental Science Updates, 2024; 5(1): 49-58. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2024.188601.1158
Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar, Evaluation of a New Scale of Difficulty
1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Faculty of Dentistry
Suez Canal University
2Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University
3Dean College of Dentistry University of Science and Technology of Fujairah (UAE), Egypt
Abstract
Introduction: Assessment of the surgical complexity of lower third molar extraction is a crucial step to formulate an optimal treatment plan, balancing the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical extraction procedure to manage intraoperative complications and postoperative pain. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a new scale of surgical difficulty for the extraction of the impacted lower third molar. Patients and methods: Fifty-four patients were attended for lower third molar extraction. All patients undergoing the same surgical approach including anesthesia, incision, and elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap, ostectomy, and tooth sectioning, elevation, and avulsion according to the root axis, socket debridement, and suturing. The period of this study extended for 2 years. Results: The mesio angular impaction was the most common type of impaction, followed by horizontal impaction. There was agreement between the preoperative and the postoperative assessment of a simple operation. 26 third molars (48.15%) were considered preoperatively medium difficulty group, and 80.77% was agreement between the preoperative and the postoperative assessments of moderately simple (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our scale is effective since the mandibular third molars with the highest scores were significantly correlated to longer ostectomy time and total surgical time.