• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Dental Science Updates
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 6 (2025)
Volume Volume 5 (2024)
Volume Volume 4 (2023)
Volume Volume 3 (2022)
Volume Volume 2 (2021)
Volume Volume 1 (2020)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Kamel, A. (2020). comparative study between two types of bone graft in dental implant. Dental Science Updates, 1(2), 113-120. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2020.18382.1016
Amr Abdelnasser Kamel. "comparative study between two types of bone graft in dental implant". Dental Science Updates, 1, 2, 2020, 113-120. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2020.18382.1016
Kamel, A. (2020). 'comparative study between two types of bone graft in dental implant', Dental Science Updates, 1(2), pp. 113-120. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2020.18382.1016
Kamel, A. comparative study between two types of bone graft in dental implant. Dental Science Updates, 2020; 1(2): 113-120. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2020.18382.1016

comparative study between two types of bone graft in dental implant

Article 5, Volume 1, Issue 2, September 2020, Page 113-120  XML PDF (2.2 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/dsu.2020.18382.1016
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Amr Abdelnasser Kamel email
Faculty of dentistry, misr international university,cairo,egypt
Abstract
ABSTRACT:
Introduction osseointegration around dental implant is the key word of implant stability and bone grafts have a big share for enhancing osseointegration .
Aim of the study: To evaluate the efficacy of two different types of bone graft, the (OsteonII) and (Biogen).
Patients and methods: This study was carried out on fifteen healthy male patientswith averageage from 20 to 40 years old.. 15 immediate dental implants were dividedinto (group1)immediate placement of 6 dental implant into fresh extracted bony socket with bone graft OsteonII,(group 2) immediate placement of 6 dental implant with bone graft BioGen and in, (group 3)immediate placement of 3dental implant into fresh extracted bony socket without bone graft.Clinical examination was donefor all patients befor surgery. Radiographic evaluation using CBCT was done after 2weeks and 3, 6 months postoperatively to measure bone density around inserted implants and vertical bone loss.
Results: Radiographic evaluation showed significant higher bone density and lesser vertical bone loss around the inserted implants in groupII than groupI after two weeks, 6 and 9 months. Also, implant stability measurements at six and nine months showed higher values in group II than in group I.
4 / 21
Conclusion: immediate implant placement can be done successfully using either OsteonII or BioGen bone grafts but, BioGenare superior with using immediate dental implant than OsteonII regarding bone density and implant stability around implant.
Key words:Alloplastic bone grafts-Immidiate placement-CBCT–Implant stability.
Keywords
Bone; grafts; immediate; placement; CBCT; stability
Main Subjects
oral and maxillofacial surgery
Statistics
Article View: 612
PDF Download: 1,983
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.